Transforming Policy into Action through Strategic Village Fund Optimization for Sustainable Rural Development

Authors

  • Edi Susanto Universitas Dumai
  • Ridarmin Universitas Dumai
  • Rineliana Universitas Dumai
  • Agung Gunawan Universitas Dumai
  • Omar Farrakhan Tampubolon Universitas Gadjah Mada

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.556442/eabmij.v8i02.1258

Keywords:

Village Fund, community participation, Village SDGs, good governance, Kemuning Sub-district

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of utilizing the community participation-based Village Fund (Dana Desa, a government grant program for villages) in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) at the village level in Kemuning Sub-district, Indragiri Hilir Regency, Riau Province. Employing a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach, the research integrates quantitative Pearson correlation analysis with qualitative Miles and Huberman (1994) content analysis across three purposively selected villages: Batu Ampar (independent status), Kemuning Muda (developing), and Tuk Jimun (advanced). The findings reveal a significant upward trend in Musrenbangdes (annual village development planning forum) participation rates (36–100%) and complete budget realization (100%) for 2022–2024, with a total absorption of IDR 6.75 billion. Village Fund allocation was primarily directed toward the economic pillar of SDG 8 (45%), followed by the social pillar of SDG 3 (35%) and the environmental pillar of SDGs 6 and 15 (20%). Pearson's correlation yielded r = 1.000 (Sig. < 0.01), indicating a perfect linear relationship between budget allocation and realization. Kemuning's participatory model empirically supports the World Bank's Community Driven Development (CDD) theory and Arnstein's (1969) participation ladder, with a culture of mutual cooperation and synergy between BPD-Kades (Village Consultative Body and Village Head) identified as key success factors. The study recommends replicating this model across 429 remote villages in Riau Province by digitalizing Siskeudes (village financial services) and strengthening BPD mandates.

References

Afrilia, S., Nurhayati, S., & Santoso, A. (2024). Pengaruh akuntabilitas pengelolaan Dana Desa dan digitalisasi pelaporan keuangan terhadap Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Desa: Studi kasus Kecamatan Wagir, Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Desa Berkelanjutan, 15(1), 78-92.

Arief, R., Kornita, S. E., & Tampubolon, D. (2023). Pengaruh dana desa, pertumbuhan ekonomi dan belanja langsung terhadap kemiskinan di Provinsi Riau tahun 2016–2020. Jurnal Ekonomi & Ekonomi Syariah (JESYA), 6(1), 408–421. https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v6i1.942

Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225

BPS Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir. (2024). Indeks Desa Membangun Kabupaten Indragiri Hilir 2024. BPS.

Chamber, R. (2017). Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA): Analysis of experience. World Development, 42(7), 1253–1268.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darmawansyah, R., Syapsan, & Tampubolon, D. (2021). Penggunaan dana desa dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan masyarakat Desa Teluk Nilap, Kecamatan Kubu Babussalam, Kabupaten Rokan Hilir, Provinsi Riau. Bussman Journal: Indonesian Journal of Business and Management, 1(3), 511–530. https://doi.org/10.53363/buss.v1i3.44

Hasanuddin, H., Tahir, M. Z., & Nurdin, N. (2021). Efektivitas penggunaan anggaran Dana Desa terhadap pembangunan berkelanjutan Desa Lamantu, Kabupaten Kepulauan Selayar. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 10(3), 112-130.

Hermansyah, M., Mas’ud, M. I., Munir, M., Wahid, A., & Nuriyanto , N. (2025). Pengembangan Kampung Tempe Parerejo melalui pendampingan sistem produksi tempe berbasis Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA) .Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(9), 4507–4522. https://doi.org/10.59141/japendi.v6i9.8639

Ikrimah, I., & Faralita, F. (2025). Optimalisasi penggunaan Dana Desa untuk pembangunan berkelanjutan di Desa Teluk Timbau, Kecamatan Dusun Hilir, Kabupaten Barito Selatan. Jurnal Tata Kelola Desa, 17(1), 34-49.

Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi. (2020). Pedoman Umum Pembangunan Desa dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa (Permendesa PDTT No. 21 Tahun 2020). Kemendesa PDTT.

Kementerian Desa, Pembangunan Daerah Tertinggal, dan Transmigrasi. (2023). Prioritas penggunaan Dana Desa tahun 2024 (Permendesa PDTT No. 7 Tahun 2023). Kemendesa PDTT.

Kementerian Keuangan RI. (2025). Laporan realisasi Dana Desa nasional 2024. Kemenkeu RI.

Kementerian PPN/BAPPENAS. (2021). Pedoman SDGs Desa: 18 tujuan prioritas nasional. BAPPENAS.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mujalli, A., & Syarif, E. (2024). Model pengelolaan dana desa berbasis Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) DESA. (2024). Revenue : Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan Dan Ekonomi Islam, 7(01), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.56998/jr.v7i01.72

Novrianti, Tampubolon, D., & Mardiana. (2022). Pengaruh dana desa dan alokasi dana desa terhadap kemiskinan di Kabupaten Pelalawan. JEMBA: Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, Manajemen dan Bisnis, Akuntansi, 2(2), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.57302/jemba.v2i2.60

Purvis, B., Mao, Y. & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14(3), 681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5

Ramadhani, D., Soraya, D., Febriyanti, S., Astuti, M. P., Pramudita, R., Astuti, P. D., Nefindia, R. R., Syafira, R. F., Tabina, S., Mentari, A., & Sawedo, P. A. (2025). Tata kelola dana desa dalam mewujudkan akuntabilitas dan transparansi pemerintahan desa. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Mahasiswa, 4(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.61722/jipm.v4i1.1841

Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.

Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syapsan, Tampubolon, D., & Kornita, S. E. (2020). Kemiskinan multidimensi dalam percepatan pencapaian sustainable development goals (SDGs) di Riau. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 17(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.31849/jieb.v17i1.3323

Tampubolon, D., & Mardiana. (2022). Kebijakan belanja desa untuk pemberdayaan masyarakat. Societas: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Sosial, 11(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.35746/societas.v11i1.218

Tyas, N. P., Widodo, A., & Susanto, H. (2025). Model Perencanaan Dan Penganggaran Dana Desa Dalam Akselerasi Sustainable Development Goals Desa. Jurnal Agregasi : Aksi Reformasi Government Dalam Demokrasi, 13(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.34010/xqze9n83

UNDP. (1997). Governance for sustainable human development. United Nations Development Programme. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/243?ln=en

Upe, A. ., Hos, J. ., Arsyad, M. ., Roslan, S., & Supiyah, R. (2024). Optimizing Village Funds for Sustainable Development: A Technical Guidance Services in Tokowuta Village, Lasolo Sub-district. Indonesian Journal of Community Services, 3(1), 76-83. https://doi.org/10.47540/ijcs.v3i1.1400

WCED. (1987). Our common future (Brundtland Report). Oxford University Press.

World Bank. (2000). The quality of growth. Oxford University Press.

World Bank. (2017). Community-driven development: From principles to practice. World Bank Group.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30